Well, it's done and done.
I've not logged into SWTOR too much recently as it's just been ... well, SWTOR. I was excited about the Super Secret Space Project, but sadly, after playing the beta I was less than impressed. It's a twitchy, min-maxxing nightmare of PVP. I'm sure loads of folks will like it, but it's simply not for me and that's ok.
I loaded it up today, just to give it another shot; one more chance for SWTOR to shine in my eyes. It failed. Miserably. The space combat just isn't ... it's just not what I was hoping.
So, I've cancelled for real this time. I'll be uninstalling soon, I think. I don't even feel like playing it as a free-to-player, to be honest. SWTOR, for me, has sunsetted. I'll be eagerly awaiting the next iteration of Star Wars in the gaming space, whether it be the long-gestating DICE Battlefront product, or the rumors of a new EA-produced Star Wars open world game.
Either way, it was fun while it lasted. Fare thee well, SWTOR. You made me love you, made me hate you, but ultimately ...
You just made me not care anymore.
See ya'll 'round the bend.
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
In my previous post, we spoke about destructability, enemy AI, and the lack of leveling (*wink wink*). But those topics do not encompass all my thoughts and feelings about EQNext. No, fellow agents, I have many, many feels for this game. Let's lock and load.
Dave Georgeson spoke of the new art direction that EQN is striving for, a heroic 'rough and tumble' look. Many, many fans have decried this as 'WoW-cartoony graphics!11!!111eleventyone!'
|Ready for tumblin' and/or roughin'.|
They point to the Kerran Warrior as the 'WoW-ified' Everquest. Tell ya what folks ... if my WoW Warrior looked as good as THAT, then I'd be a pretty happy camper. What most folks miss in this is that Rosie Rappaport, Art Director for EQN, specifically chose this art style so that EQN will remain playable for decades (and has stated so on her twitter). Let's take a look at the original EQ and the newer EQ2 (which launched basically alongside WoW):
|EQ1: We are driving cars in the garden of our minds! (RIP Mr. Rogers)|
|EQ2: We'll agree to disagree.|
They haven't exactly aged as gracefully as we'd like. Granted, I'll give EQ1 a pass since it's 14+ years old, but EQ2? C'mon. Yer not even tryin'. EQ2 was trying for an edgier, more realistic approach to character models. It's not aged as well as it could have; now, EQ2ers, don't think I'm bagging on your game! In the interest of fairness, I downloaded EQ2 from Steam last weekend and made an Ogre Shadowknight. He looked pretty decent and the armor he was wearing was actually pretty nice. So, it's not all bad. Your environments ... those needed some love. But the character model wasn't as animated as it could be. My ogre didn't feel connected to the ground and when I strafed sideways, my character's bottom half didn't rotate to face the proper way ... I ran sideways with while my feet steadily pumped forward, gleefully unaware of this new change in direction. Compare that to WoW's character design where direction changes are mirrored by the avatar. Also, a more exaggerated WoW look has lent itself well to the game's longevity.
|WoW: Ok, so maybe this doesn't make my point all that well.|
But you understand where I'm going with it right?!
Fast forward to Everquest Next and their models. Holy shit. There's an exaggerated style there that really pops. The faces are well-animated and easy to read. The emotes are fantastically rendered. This could actually prove that SOEmote was a good idea (remember laughing about it back when it was launched for EQ2 ... yeah, no one's laughing now).
I did have a few problems with the characters and animations, though. Firstly, that vaulting. Parkour style 'heroic movement' as Georgeson called it was pretty nifty ... except when the characters got to a vaulting move. They were gracefully running along, fabric and cloth textures flying! It was glorious! Oh no! A low rise ahead! Without the player having to prompt the character, they automatically went completely 90 degrees into a static sideways motion and then plopped straight back down. Graceful running, wtf sideways, graceful running again. They're gonna need to work on that.
The other problem I had was, honestly, with the armor on the Kerran. It was way too bulky and large, almost too detailed for a piece that size. His bracers alone looked like shields. My fear is this ... most of the armor will follow the same path, and as it gets better and better, and the characters get more and more powerful, we run into the World of Warcraft Orc Shoulder problem. The problem, WoWOSP as it is known (by me only but whatever it's my blog so shut up) basically turns regular shoulderpads on any other race into ridiculously oversized dining platters fit to serve entire armies. During Burning Crusade and Lich King, orc shoulders grew so expansive that they were absolutely ridiculous. I fear the same curve for EQN. In the quest for providing the coolest armor possible, the elements of the armor will become so comically large that we'll dip into that dreaded 'cartoony' look. I'm sure the good folks at SOE won't let that happen, but I worry nonetheless.
All in all, I'm very pleased with the style that EQN is using; exaggerated but not WoW-ified, Fable-esque yet familiar. I think it will service the game well for years.
On the next installment of 'Imperial Intelligence: Norrath Division', Targeter downloads Everquest 2 and plays it. And doesn't hate it! Oh, quite the opposite in fact.
Thursday, August 8, 2013
What the fuck. It has taken me 6 days to process what I saw last Friday at 3pm Eastern.
Dave Georgeson just dropped a nuclear load on our collective heads, spreading his arms wide afterwards as if to say, "Are you not entertained?!"
Unlike many MMO players, I didn't get my start in EverQuest. I missed that train by a couple of years (fun fact, my first 'MMO' was Puzzle Pirates!) but got caught up in the WoW juggernaut. I still log into WoW occasionally, believe it or not ... for all its foibles, there is some solid gameplay there. Yes, it tends to fade quickly after that initial rush of nostalgia, but it still provides a good experience.
Many of my friends (including many in my SWTOR guild, Vanguard of Norrath) *DID* get their start in EQ though, and when they reminisce about it, I'm enthralled. Truth is, I've never felt a kinship to an MMO like they do with EQ. It was more than likely due to a few factors:
- EQ was the first game of its type (commercially successful Western MMO)
- EQ was incredibly social
- EQ burst onto the scene when the internet really began to take off
- EQ was a completely different type of experience than RPGs of the day
- EQ was pretty damn hardcore
They speak with such reverence about EQ that I can't help but want that for myself. Sure, I'm attached to WoW but there's no real emotion there. I like the people I play with (mostly) and I like the game (mostly), but if I quit tomorrow ... who cares? I'd probably log back in at some later point again because WoW's such a sticky drug, but I'd feel no real connection to it.
Same with SWTOR. It's a fantastic game, and although I'm on a break from it at the moment (only log on once a week when I get time), I can't say I'm all that devoted to it. If the servers were shut off tomorrow, I'd feel sad but there'd be no real loss. My friends and I would just move on to the next game.
But when my buddies talk about EQ, they speak as if the actual game world was their friend. The world was a character and they just happened to live on it. And it's so fantastically amazing to me. I want that type of experience!
Friday, August 2nd. A day that may have well changed ol' Targeter's perceptions about what an MMO is and what it could be. Everquest Next is the newest iteration of Norrath from the boys and girls at SOE. Let's just run down what I found interesting about the game:
- Destructible environments
- No leveling (seriously, there are no levels in the game)
- Multi-classing (with no artificial limit on how many classes you can have)
- Radiant AI for enemies
- Persistent, player-driven change to the game world
- Multiple strata of the world (that can all be explored)
- No button bloat (8 ability slots only)
- No holy trinity (roles can be played, but aren't required)
- Crafting that matters
- Hugely social
- Free to play
Yeah. If you need some time to process this, or just need to see it for yourself, I highly recommend seeing the debut video (skip to 26:30 if you want to head straight to the reveal ... but I highly recommend watching the whole thing), the lore panels, and the class panels. Lots of good info there. Plus, it'll keep you busy for about four hours.
What the videos cover is an MMO, basically, that I've never seen before. Ever. Oh, there have been tidbits here and there, scattered across other MMOs; multiclassing is vaguely like the souls in Rift, static action bar is similar to what Guild Wars 2 has, the lack of a trinity reminds me of the new experiment SWTOR is trying with the Czerka story modes, crafting reminds me of what WoW crafting used to be like back in vanilla and BC.
But when you throw in radiant enemy AI, fully destructible environments with multiple layers of the world that can all be explored, the lack of leveling (although it may just be dressed up and called 'tiers'), player-driven change through world-wide Rallying Calls, the intense social experience that EQN will require, and all of that wrapped up in a free to play package with a subscription option?
Now, let's put on the practical hat real quick. Can they really deliver on all this? Can they really just 'release orcs into the world' and let the enemy AI provide a compelling gameplay experience? Can mobs really display the behavior in-game that the debut video mentioned? We'll have to wait and see. But if they can deliver on only half of what they promise ... well, that'd be a helluva an MMO.
Now, let's get on to stuff that really impressed and/or worries me:
The enemy AI is of particular import. They say that they will generate enemies and then release them into the world. When released, they'll follow their own AI paths to determine where the best place to place down stakes and be nuisances. Now, in theory this sounds AWESOME. It will be like a living, breathing world where enemies react to their environments and shift strategies appropriately. My biggest fear is that the AI will not be as smart as they claim, and the enemies will wind up just patting back and forth between two points. And how will the AI react if there are tons of adventuring groups start pounding on them? Will they see this as a trigger for releasing a massive attack? Will better equipped players be able to 'sabotage' new player areas by modifying the attack patterns of mobs? And will this all even work? Or will it just be a mish-mash of standard AI constructs that are masquerading as advanced AI?
Destructible environments are absolutely amazing. In games like Battlefield 3 and Red Faction, you can modify the battlefield by destroying the environment around you. EQN plans to bring this to MMOs with destructible terrain via voxels. Furthermore, this destruction can open up brand new areas of gameplay located below the surface world, providing new adventuring opportunities. This opens a wealth of adventuring that players can take part in, both above- and below-ground. And the neatest thing is that with destructability comes constructability. Players will have the option of using server-wide Rallying Calls, basically huge public quests that folks can participate in to create or destroy new cities, forge new empires, attack enemy forces, etc etc. They will also have access to magic that builds structures around them to prevent attack; the enemy then has to go around (or through) that structure. This type of gameplay has all sorts of ramifications for players ... what are the opportunities for griefing? Can this be exploited in PVP? Can this be exploited in PVE to create an 'ultimate' combo for killing mobs? And exactly how much of the world can be destroyed before it 'heals back?' Will the devs have to curtail how much we can blow up in order to keep the world together? And if they do curtail it, then does destructability then become a gimmick to be used at certain times at certain places in the world?
EQN gets rid of levels. We won't have to grind to max cap in order to participate in cool stuff. This, honestly, has been the biggest gripe of mine for a long time. It takes so long to level up to get to the 'real game' that the leveling experience just becomes an annoyance. Now, according to Dave Georgeson, EQN will have a horizontal progression as opposed to a vertical progression, represented in multi-classing and tier sets. You'll gain power as you go all Pokemon on those classes (collect 'em all!) and then you'll have opportunities to power up some of your abilities by completing certain requirements. So, hooray for no leveling? Or ... does EQN just very smartly hide its leveling behind tier sets? They claim to have horizontal, not vertical leveling, but I don't know if this is actually the case. I see it as more of a hybrid. You've got a cap for each class, aka the highest tier available in the game (let's say it's five). So, a cap of five in each class. Now the goal is to tier cap in each class that you like to play, thereby 'reaching max level' by gaining as much power as you need. They've not really talked a whole bunch about what this means for gamers, but we can infer a few things:
- All content will be available for play as soon as you find it
- You won't be able to do all the content if you are a low tier player
- You can play with your friends of lower tiers by switching from your high tier classes to a lower tier class
That's very exciting to me.
I've got some other issues, like character models and the graphics in general (very busy combat graphically, and characters have poor vaulting animations/don't seem connected to the ground), the combat demo was over the top and not representative of what you'll see in-game, and other stuff, but we'll save that for another post.
All in all, EQN looks intriguing. It definitely has ol' Targeter's eye.
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Me and Itchy, we're a team, you see. We're both dreamers and fighters, lovers and scoundrels. He's got that scratchy voice, those strong legs, that mount hither look. Me, I got charm, a blaster at my side, and my own cargo hold full o' luck. Me and Itchy, we're headin' places, you understand?
When I found ol' Itchy, hell, he'd been hanging out on Hoth his whole life, waitin' for fate to find him. He wanted to see the stars, be somethin' more than just another lost tauntaun. He'd seen that tundra, that mountain, the gorge, and a bellyful of wampas. He'd seen all there was to see on that iceball. He had dreams. A thousand yard stare and a back made for saddles, Itchy was destined for more. More than Hoth or some wampa's meal, that's for sure.
Itchy ain't never seen the sights of the galaxy, so me and him, we're gonna go raise some hell. Meet some chicks, show 'em the ole 'Uttini Two-Step.' Maybe we'll even give them Imps somethin' to think about.
That's me and Itchy. A Chiss and his tauntaun, tearin' up the galaxy.
|Still a better love story than Twilight.|
You can find your own special tauntaun on Hoth, near Aurek/Dorne base. There will be two vendors standing there, one with the Tundra Tauntaun (like Itchy), the Tauntaun Data, and Tauntaun Lures, and the other with just the Brown Tauntaun. It takes 15 data to get the Tundra, 20 to get the Brown. Reports from on-planet put farming up 15-20 data taking 2+ hours. If you wish to just buy the data (15 for Tundra, 20 for Brown), it'll run you 1.5 and 2 million creds respectively. I think this may the coolest vehicle in the game.
I named him Itchy.
He is my tauntaun.
I will pet him and love him and call him Itchy.
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
What's the butcher's bill for the latest Steam Sale? Why, let's take a look what ol' Targeter bought.
X3: Terran Conflict
Blood Bowl: Chaos Edition
Rollercoaster Tycoon 3
Kerbal Space Program
Galaxy on Fire 2
Port Royale 3
Sid Meier's Civilization V
Ick. My wallet appreciates the end of this sale.
Friday, July 19, 2013
At SDCC (San Diego Comic-Con), Bioware teased the TOR playerbase with these beauties.
That's right. Tauntauns are coming to TOR! Cartel Market item, I should think. Maybe in both the packs and a straight up purchase. Either way, they look sorta awesometacular. And this means more live mounts later! Maybe gundarks, veractyls (Obi-Wan's mount in Revenge of the Sith), banthas ... the list is pretty long and varied.
This is a step in the right direction ... one that will make TOR feel much more Star Wars-y. Good on ya, Bioware! Maybe this will get me to log on some more ... I'm sort of on a playing hiatus since the last double XP weekend. It's just too dang nice outside to spend all day cooped up playing internet wizards, you know what I mean?